Today's Date: February 8, 2023
Institute for Women's Policy Research Statement on State of the Union Address   •   SHAREHOLDER ACTION REMINDER: The Schall Law Firm Encourages Investors in PLDT Inc. with Losses of $100,000 to Contact the Firm   •   M-Files Acquires No-Code Document Automation Company Ment   •   AARP Responds to 2023 State of the Union Address   •   Longboard Pharmaceuticals Announces Pricing of Public Offering of Common Stock   •   BORN PRIMITIVE TO HONOR MILITARY SPOUSES IN OPERATION HOMEFRONT HEROES   •   ALLIANZ ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Announces that a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against Allianz SE and Encou   •   REPLY: Registration for the Sixth Edition of the Reply Code Challenge Is Now Open   •   Taking a Deep Look at its Past, Vassar Announces New Inclusive History Initiative   •   How Women Lead Adds Third Regional Chapter in the U.S. to Support Senior Executive Women   •   Center for Caregiver Advancement Addresses Urgent Need for Caregiver Training Through Career Pathways Program   •   Gibson Energy Maintains Industry-Leading Safety Performance and Sustainability Leadership Position for 2022   •   Xponential Fitness, Inc. Announces Pricing of Secondary Offering of Class A Common Stock by Selling Stockholders   •   Brookdale Announces Date of Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2022 Earnings Release and Conference Call   •   Kay Baltzell-Rathbone's newly released "Communing With Christ" is a thought-provoking collection of devotions that encourage ref   •   TBN Presents THE JOURNEY: A Music Special From Andrea Bocelli Coming to Theaters Nationwide Beginning April 2   •   CareSource Named As Headline Sponsor of Inaugural EDDIE Awards Honoring Entrepreneurs With Disabilities   •   Mitsubishi Electric to Support Earthquake Relief in Southern Turkey   •   Freshpaint Announces Easy Way to Make Google Analytics and Ad Platforms HIPAA-Compliant   •   Rovensa Group Launches Rovensa Next, a New Global Biosolutions Business Unit to Shape a Sustainable Future for Agriculture
Bookmark and Share

ACLU Demands Disclosure Of New Parameters Immigration Enforcement Program


Federal 287(g) Initiative Results In Illegal Profiling And Threatens Public Safety
WASHINGTON – The American Civil Liberties Union filed a Freedom of Information Act request Tuesday for new documents governing the continued delegation to state and local law enforcement agencies of federal immigration enforcement authority. The fundamentally flawed program has been associated with serious civil rights abuses and public safety concerns.
Secretary Janet Napolitano announced Friday that the Department of Homeland Security had developed a new standardized Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for use when it delegates immigration enforcement authority to specific agencies under Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. She also announced that DHS had entered into new MOAs with 11 additional law enforcement agencies. However, DHS refused requests by journalists and the public to release the 11 recently-signed MOAs and the new standardized agreement, even though DHS routinely made 287(g) MOAs public under the Bush administration.
“No amount of tinkering with the 287(g) program is likely to solve the fact that it threatens public safety and undermines the basic guarantee of equal treatment by increasing profiling of people who look or sound ‘foreign,’” said Omar Jadwat, staff attorney with the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project. “Still, DHS’s refusal to disclose these new documents is a disappointing and legally unsupportable step back from with Bush administration practice and makes it impossible to fully evaluate the changes to this highly controversial program. DHS should immediately release the documents we have requested.”
The ACLU has long sought to end the 287(g) agreements between DHS and state or local agencies that are, by design, fundamentally flawed.  The 287(g) agreements have encouraged illegal racial profiling and civil rights abuses as well as the mistaken and unlawful detention and deportation of U.S. citizens and permanent residents, as reflected in a series of lawsuits, all while diverting scarce resources from traditional local law enforcement functions.
“Enforcement of immigration law, like tax law, belongs exclusively to the federal government.  One body of immigration law governs the entire country; those laws are written and passed by Congress and should be enforced by federal law enforcement, not by local and state police,” said Joanne Lin, ACLU Legislative Counsel. “There is a specialized federal agency to focus on immigration enforcement – DHS – just as there is a specialized federal agency to focus on tax compliance and enforcement – the IRS.  State and local police do not pull drivers over for tax law violations; likewise they should not pull drivers over for immigration law violations. The 287(g) program has proven to be a failure -- resulting in rampant illegal profiling by local police under the cloak of federal immigration enforcement power. DHS needs to terminate, not tweak, the 287(g) program.”
This past April, the Police Foundation, a leading nonpartisan, research and training nonprofit dedicated to improving public safety, reported that many sheriffs and police chiefs across the country disapprove of the local immigration enforcement program. According to the Police Foundation study, law enforcement executives believe that “immigration enforcement by local police undermines their core public safety mission, diverts scarce resources, increases their exposure to liability and litigation, and exacerbates fear in communities already distrustful of police.” 
In recent months, Congress held two oversight hearings and heard from U.S. citizens who have been profiled and detained by local police acting under 287(g) programs.  In addition to charges of 287(g) program “mismanagement” by the Government Accountability Office, the DHS Inspector General has undertaken an audit of the 287(g) program and the Department of Justice has launched a civil rights investigation into the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, which has an extensive 287(g) program. 
In February, a federal court decided that a class action lawsuit, Ortega Melendres v. Arpaio, could proceed against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. In that case, the ACLU is co-counsel for Latino plaintiffs who were subjected to racial profiling and police misconduct by the Sheriff’s Office in Maricopa County, Arizona, a jurisdiction with the most aggressive 287(g) program in the country.  In another case, the ACLU has sued on behalf of Pedro Guzman, a U.S. citizen born in California, who was illegally deported under Los Angeles County Sheriff Office’s 287(g) program. These cases are still pending.
“If the Department of Homeland Security cannot recognize failure when everyone else involved sees it, Congress should exercise its oversight and monitoring responsibilities to end the 287(g) program,” added Lin. “Minor modifications are not enough to fix this fundamentally flawed program.”
The ACLU’s FOIA request can be found at:
For the DHS release about the revamped and expanded 287 (g) program, go to
For ACLU's submitted testimony on 287 (g) program, go to:
For ACLU report on racial and ethnic profiling in America, go to
For more information about the Ortega Melendres v. Arpaio case, go to
For more details about the Guzman case, go to


Back to top
| Back to home page

White House Live Stream
alsharpton Rev. Al Sharpton
9 to 11 am EST
jjackson Rev. Jesse Jackson
10 to noon CST


Sounds Make the News ®
Atlanta - WAOK-Urban
Berkley / San Francisco - KPFA-Progressive
Chicago - WVON-Urban
KJLH - Urban
Los Angeles - KJLH - Urban
WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
New York - WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
New York - WADO-Spanish
WBAI - Progressive
New York - WBAI - Progressive
Washington - WOL-Urban

Listen to United Natiosns News