Today's Date: February 24, 2021
Episcopal Relief & Development Supports Local Partners in Response to Winter Storms in Texas   •   BioLife Plasma Services Announces Expansion of Plasma Donation Centers Into California   •   Grunt Style Officially Licensed to Sell Air Force and Space Force Apparel   •   theSkimm Launches SkimmU, New Virtual Course Series to Help Women Take Control of Their Finances Amid the “Shecession&rdqu   •   Al Aire Con El Terrible Syndicated Morning Show With Alberto "El Terri" Cortez Expands To New Key Hispanic Markets   •   Susan G. Komen® Urges Women to Continue to Get Mammograms   •   ATI Advisory Releases Policy Blueprint for Creating Better Caregiving Jobs   •   Government of Canada to host Canada's Feminist Response and Recovery Summit to mark International Women's Day   •   The Change Company Welcomes Chris Gardner to its Board   •   Frida Mom Puts Mom Before Milk With New Breast Care Line   •   GRAPHISOFT Empowers Mission of 400 Forward as Official Software and Technology Partner   •   Healthcare is failing its own diversity test, Leverage Network finds   •   DaCultureReport Expands Hip-Hop Music Blog to Urban Lifestyle Online News Site   •   Musco Lighting Invests $5 Million in U.S. Soccer Foundation to Keep Kids Moving During Pandemic and Beyond   •   CIBC further invests in Black leaders, changemakers and entrepreneurs   •   March Of Dimes Announces 2021 March For Babies: A Mother Of A Movement™   •   RangeForce Partners With BlackGirlsHack to Address Lack of Diversity in Cybersecurity and Skills Shortage   •   Culver's Thank You Farmers® Project Donations Hit $3M   •   Every 2021MY Mazda Vehicle Tested Earns 2021 IIHS TOP SAFETY PICK+ Award   •   BBR Virtual Summit Announces Additional Partners Committed to Driving Change in Beauty and Entertainment
Bookmark and Share

ACLU Lawsuit Challenging Spying Law Gets New Life

NEW YORK – In a huge victory for privacy and the rule of law, a federal appeals court today reinstated a landmark lawsuit challenging an unconstitutional government spying law. The American Civil Liberties Union and the New York Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit in July 2008 to stop the government from conducting surveillance under the FISA Amendments Act (FAA), a statute that gives the executive branch virtually unchecked power to collect Americans' international e-mails and telephone calls. The appeals court today ruled that the plaintiffs in the case could challenge the FAA without first showing with certainty that they had been spied on under the statute.

“The government’s surveillance practices should not be immune from judicial review, and this decision ensures that they won’t be,” said Jameel Jaffer, Deputy Legal Director of the ACLU, who argued the case before the appeals court. “The law we’ve challenged permits the government to conduct dragnet surveillance of Americans’ international communications, and it has none of the safeguards that the Constitution requires. Now that the appeals court has recognized that our clients have the right to challenge the law, we look forward to pressing that challenge in the trial court.”

The ACLU filed the lawsuit on behalf of a broad coalition of attorneys and human rights, labor, legal and media organizations whose work requires them to engage in sensitive and sometimes privileged telephone and e-mail communications with colleagues, clients, journalistic sources, witnesses, experts, foreign government officials and victims of human rights abuses located outside the United States.

Creating a Catch-22 situation, U.S. District Court Judge John G. Koeltl of the Southern District of New York dismissed the case in August 2009, ruling that the plaintiffs did not have the right to challenge the new surveillance law because they could not prove that their own communications had been monitored under it – even though the plaintiffs were unable to do so because of the secrecy of the program.

Today’s ruling found that the plaintiffs have standing to challenge the law even though they cannot show to a certainty that the government is acquiring their communications, finding that“the FAA has put the plaintiffs in a lose-lose situation: either they can continue to communicate sensitive information electronically and bear a substantial risk of being monitored under a statute they allege to be unconstitutional, or they can incur financial and professional costs to avoid being monitored. Either way, the FAA directly affects them.”

“Americans shouldn’t have to accept as a fact of life that the government may be monitoring their international e-mails and phone calls and they can do nothing about it," said Christopher Dunn, Associate Legal Director of the NYCLU and co-counsel on the case. “This landmark ruling allows people to defend their right to privacy from unwarranted and illegal government surveillance.”

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Amnesty v. McConnell, are Amnesty International USA, Global Fund for Women, Global Rights, Human Rights Watch, International Criminal Defence Attorneys Association, The Nation magazine, PEN American Center, Service Employees International Union, Washington Office on Latin America, Daniel N. Arshack, David Nevin, Scott McKay and Sylvia Royce.

Attorneys on the lawsuit are Jaffer and Laurence M. Schwartztol of the ACLU; Dunn, Melissa Goodman and Arthur Eisenberg of the New York Civil Liberties Union; and Charles S. Simms, Theodore K. Cheng and Matthew S. Morris of the law firm Proskauer Rose LLP. 


STORY TAGS: ACLU , NYCLU , FAA , Spying

Video

White House Live Stream
LIVE VIDEO EVERY SATURDAY
alsharpton Rev. Al Sharpton
9 to 11 am EST
jjackson Rev. Jesse Jackson
10 to noon CST


Video

LIVE BROADCASTS
Sounds Make the News ®
WAOK-Urban
Atlanta - WAOK-Urban
KPFA-Progressive
Berkley / San Francisco - KPFA-Progressive
WVON-Urban
Chicago - WVON-Urban
KJLH - Urban
Los Angeles - KJLH - Urban
WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
New York - WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
WADO-Spanish
New York - WADO-Spanish
WBAI - Progressive
New York - WBAI - Progressive
WOL-Urban
Washington - WOL-Urban

Listen to United Natiosns News