September 29, 2020         
Armbrust American Launches Petition to Legalize Child-Size Surgical Masks   •   Future Today Expands Its Hit Programming Into Free Linear “FAST” Channels   •   8-Year-Old Writes New Book to Help Children Face Their Fears During the Pandemic   •   HITN Launches “Edye” SVOD Service and Mobile Apps for the United States and Latin America Markets   •   New Research From Accenture and Girls Who Code Outlines Steps to Double the Number of Women in Technology in 10 Years   •   AMC’s “The Walking Dead” Invades Magic: The Gathering on October 4th   •   WBC Digital Summit Tackles Equity for All Business Women   •   Susan G. Komen® Calls for Month of Action to Support Breast Cancer Patients During Pandemic   •   BlackNorth Initiative to Host Their Inaugural Virtual Quebec Summit Wednesday, September 30   •   Rockwell Automation Recognized for Culture of Supporting Women by The Society of Women Engineers   •   Former Paraplegic Reveals Why National Disabilities Employment Awareness Month is a Time to Be Inspired   •   Entrepreneur JoAnn Scaife Launches Intriguing New Weekly Podcast, "Black History Matters 365"   •   Mindprint Learning & NWEA Partner to Provide Individualized Learning Plans To Support Remote & In-Person Learning   •   HyperX Announces New Impact DDR4 SODIMM Memory Amid Record Levels of Notebook and PC Sales   •   Puritize®, a new UV-C Home Sanitizing System, Announces Results of SARS-CoV-2 Scientific Testing   •   Meijer Announces First-Ever Supplier Diversity Summit Aimed at Ensuring Inclusivity on Its Shelves   •   Award-Winning, Multi-Faceted Michelle J. Lamont Launches Multi-Platform Network Aimed at Manifesting Miracles   •   Featuring Keynote Speakers Sallie Krawcheck and Pam Kostka, Prominent Investors Join Venture Academy Beta Boom to Celebrate Risi   •   Jennifer Lopez and Yoplait® Challenge Families to Dance and Play for a Cause   •   Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University (PMU) launches a Youth Leadership Program
Bookmark and Share

California Supreme Court Called On To "Squash" Group's Prop 8 Appeal Efforts

SAN FRANCISCO  — The California Supreme Court has agreed to answer a question by the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on whether or not supporters of a California ballot measure can continue litigation about that measure's constitutionality when state officials decide against doing so.  A three-judge panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals certified the question in the Prop 8 case, Perry v. Schwarzenegger, on January 4. Marriage Project Director Jennifer C. Pizer of Lambda Legal had this to say following the announcement: 

"Because the federal appeals judges said they need clarification, we look forward to a decision by the California Supreme Court confirming that initiative proponents lack legal standing to continue the Perry case.  They are not law enforcers, and have the same limited rights as everyone else to litigate only when their own rights are at stake, not merely to assert their opinions about others' rights."  

Initiative proponents also cannot step into the shoes of the attorney general, the governor or other state officials.  The reason for this is basic:  the governor and attorney general are elected by the people to represent all the people, not just one point of view on one issue, out of countless, competing concerns. Most importantly, state officials swear an oath to uphold the federal and state constitutions, including their abiding promises of equal protection and due process for everyone.  Initiative proponents take no such oath, and have no such duties.  

Empowering initiative proponents with a special, new exception to these rules would be mistaken in any circumstances but the error is especially stark in this case.  Prop 8's proponents claim to represent "the people," but in fact they only represent some seven million voters in a state of 38 million residents.  Moreover, according to the U.S. Census, the tiny group of same-sex-couple residents targeted by Prop 8 is only around 200,000 people, or less than 2% of the population.  

The state high court's previous decision to allow the initiative power to be used in the unprecedented way Prop 8 did – to strip a terribly vulnerable minority of a fundamental constitutional right – also stripped the equality guarantees out of the California Constitution.  Yet another departure now from bedrock California law to allow proponents an exception from the "legal standing" rules would invite further, deeply problematic consequences.  It would mean proponents could enter every case about an initiative to argue against the state's position.  They could refuse ever to compromise about anything concerning the litigation process.  And they could object to every settlement plan based on ideology about what the law should be, rather than what it is.  

If the California Supreme Court rules that initiative proponents do indeed lack standing, as we believe is proper, we hope it brings a prompt end to the barrier facing lesbian and gay couples, who only wish to love and care for each other with their government's equal blessing in civil marriage."



STORY TAGS: GENERAL, BLACK NEWS, AFRICAN AMERICAN NEWS, LATINO NEWS, HISPANIC NEWS, MINORITY NEWS, CIVIL RIGHTS, DISCRIMINATION, RACISM, DIVERSITY, RACIAL EQUALITY, BIAS, EQUALITY

Video

White House Live Stream
LIVE VIDEO EVERY SATURDAY
alsharpton Rev. Al Sharpton
9 to 11 am EST
jjackson Rev. Jesse Jackson
10 to noon CST


Video

LIVE BROADCASTS
Sounds Make the News ®
WAOK-Urban
Atlanta - WAOK-Urban
KPFA-Progressive
Berkley / San Francisco - KPFA-Progressive
WVON-Urban
Chicago - WVON-Urban
KJLH - Urban
Los Angeles - KJLH - Urban
WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
New York - WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
WADO-Spanish
New York - WADO-Spanish
WBAI - Progressive
New York - WBAI - Progressive
WOL-Urban
Washington - WOL-Urban

Listen to United Natiosns News