Today's Date: April 15, 2021
Ancestry Appoints Gene Alston to its Board of Directors   •   Period Partner® Donates 30,000+ Products to United Way Central Alberta   •   Citizens for a Pro-Business Delaware Joins Pastor Hackett's Protest for Diversity on Chancery Court   •   FIBRA Prologis Launches a US$400 Million Sustainable Line of Credit   •   Florida House Unanimously Passes Gail's Law Rape Kit Tracking Bill by Representative Emily Slosberg   •   Dan Rodimer Holding "Wrestle for Your Rights" Saturday, Free WWE-Themed Event for Families in TX-06   •   Wrangler® Unveils Global Sustainability Platform: WeCare Wrangler™   •   Celebrating 100,000 COVID-19 Doses at Minnesota’s Community Health Centers   •   Feel the Rush and Live the Drama in F1® 2021 – A Next-Gen Experience From Codemasters®   •   PocketSuite Partners With ShearShare to Help Stylists Boost Business   •   Female Founders Develop Unique Internship Program For Diverse Community Of Women Working Toward Tech Degrees   •   Women in Manufacturing Education Foundation Now Accepting Nominations for the 2021 Women in Manufacturing Hall of Fame   •   The Alliance for Women in Media Foundation Opens Applications for 2021 Scholarship Program   •   CUPE Lays Out Priorities for Budget 2021   •   Core™ Now Available for Free Exclusively on the Epic Games Store   •   The Cree Development Corporation announces the completion of the Request for Proposals process for the Feasibility Study for Pha   •   Denver to host first-ever Concacaf Nations League Finals in June 2021   •   Rene Whitt Published First Book 'The EXTRAOrdinary Skye' for Down Syndrome Children   •   San Antonio Nonprofit Receives Funding for Affordable Housing Remix   •   Visiting Angels Named a Top Franchise for Women in New Independent Survey
Bookmark and Share

Civil Rights Groups Ask Court To Block AZ Law

 PHOENIX, AZ – Late Friday, MALDEF and a coalition of civil rights groups asked a federal court to block Arizona from implementing its controversial new law, known as SB 1070, pending a final court ruling on its constitutionality. The law requires police to demand papers’ from people they stop who they suspect are "unlawfully present" in the U.S. According to the coalition, the law would subject massive numbers of people—both citizens and non-citizens— to racial profiling, improper investigations and detention.

 

The civil rights coalition includes MALDEF, the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), the American Civil Liberties Union, the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC) – a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing JusticeACLU of Arizona, National Day Laborer Organizing Network (NDLON) and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).

 

Last month the coalition filed a lawsuit challenging the extreme law and charging that it invites the racial profiling of people of color, violates the First Amendment and interferes with federal law. Today’s filing seeks to halt implementation of the law while the case is litigated. The coalition expects that the court will rule on its request before SB 1070’s effective date, July 29, 2010.

 

“SB 1070 is an unacceptable and short-sighted attempt to take over the federal immigration system within Arizona’s borders.  Instead of helping to fix our fundamentally broken immigration system, SB 1070 will decrease the safety and security of all Arizonans by draining the resources of state, local and federal law enforcement,” stated Nina Perales, MALDEF Southwest Regional Counsel. 

 

“Arizona's thinly veiled attempt to institutionalize discrimination puts a target on the back of every immigrant and person of color within their borders,” said Karen Tumlin, managing attorney with the National Immigration Law Center. “We cannot allow the basic rights and liberties of these members of our society to be undermined simply because an unconstitutional law is now on Arizona's books.”

 

“SB 1070 is a disastrous law that would endanger public safety, increase racial profiling, and create an un-American ‘show me your papers’ regime if allowed to go into effect,” said Omar Jadwat, staff attorney with the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project. “Every day this law would be in effect would be a day too long, and we’re confident that the court will understand the importance of preventing its implementation, even while our lawsuit is pending.”

 

“We seek a preliminary injunction to head off numerous harms that are imminent if SB 1070 goes into effect.  As law enforcement officials from around the country, including Arizona, have stated, SB 1070 will lead to racial profiling of communities of color and unwarranted, prolonged detention of individuals. This will strain law enforcement resources in a way that compromises public safety for all,” stated Julie Su, Litigation Director of the Asian Pacific American Legal Center.

 

“Arizona can't pick and choose which portions of the United States Constitution to uphold. Federal law is very clear: Arizona can't subordinate the rights of Mexican-Americans or those with Latino appearance and it certainly cannot rewrite federal immigration laws,” said Pablo Alvarado, Executive Director of National Day Laborer Organizing Network. “Throughout history, when states have gone rogue and when they have unjustly and unlawfully scapegoated their residents, the court has had to intervene to be the ultimate defender of bedrock constitutional protections.”

 

“Latino communities and families in Maricopa County are already terrorized by the abusive and discriminatory practices of Sheriff Arpaio, who has blatantly used racial profiling to target them in his so-called 'crime suppression’ sweeps,” said Alessandra Soler Meetze, Executive Director of the ACLU of Arizona. “With SB 1070, the state is seeking to mandate such unconstitutional practices by all local law enforcement agencies throughout the state, and immediate court intervention is necessary to prevent that from occurring.”

 

"African-Americans know all too well the insidious effects of racial profiling," said Benjamin Todd Jealous, President and Chief Executive Officer of the NAACP. “As a nation, we should ensure equality for all rather than require police to investigate and detain people based on color and accent.  Laws that encourage discrimination have no place in this country anywhere for anyone.  SB 1070 has no place on the books, not now or ever.” 

 

Organizations and attorneys on the case, Friendly House et al. v. Halliday et al., include:

  • ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project: Omar Jadwat, Lucas Guttentag, Cecillia Wang, Tanaz Moghadam and Harini P. Raghupathi;
  • MALDEF: Thomas A. Saenz, Perales, Cynthia Valenzuela Dixon, Victor Viramontes, Gladys Limón, Nicholás Espiritu, and Ivan Espinoza-Madrigal;
  • NILC: Karen Tumlin, Linton Joaquin,  Nora A. Preciado, Melissa S. Keaney, Vivek Mittal and Ghazal Tajmiri;
  • ACLU Foundation of Arizona: Dan Pochoda and Annie Lai;
  • APALC: Julie Su, Ronald Lee, Yungsuhn Park, Connie Choi and Carmina Ocampo
  • NDLON: Chris Newman;
  • NAACP: Laura Blackburne;
  • Munger Tolles & Olson LLP: Bradley S. Phillips, Paul J. Watford, Joseph J. Ybarra, Susan T. Boyd, Yuval Miller, and Elisabeth J. Neubauer;
  • Roush, Mccracken, Guerrero, Miller & Ortega: Daniel R. Ortega, Jr.

Legal documents in the case, including today’s motion for leave to file and proposed brief in support of a preliminary injunction, can be found at: http://maldef.org/legal/sb1070_pi.pdf  

 

 

 



Back to top
| Back to home page
Video

White House Live Stream
LIVE VIDEO EVERY SATURDAY
alsharpton Rev. Al Sharpton
9 to 11 am EST
jjackson Rev. Jesse Jackson
10 to noon CST


Video

LIVE BROADCASTS
Sounds Make the News ®
WAOK-Urban
Atlanta - WAOK-Urban
KPFA-Progressive
Berkley / San Francisco - KPFA-Progressive
WVON-Urban
Chicago - WVON-Urban
KJLH - Urban
Los Angeles - KJLH - Urban
WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
New York - WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
WADO-Spanish
New York - WADO-Spanish
WBAI - Progressive
New York - WBAI - Progressive
WOL-Urban
Washington - WOL-Urban

Listen to United Natiosns News