Today's Date: December 8, 2022
Brookdale Reports November 2022 Occupancy   •   TRANSUNION ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is Investigating TransUnion on Behalf of Long-Term Stockholders and Encourages   •   Stacey Babson Kaplan Named Senior Vice President, Chief Sustainability and Compliance Officer   •   AmerisourceBergen Announces Common Share Repurchase From Walgreens Boots Alliance   •   INVESTOR ALERT: F45 Training Holdings, Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead the F45 Training Class Ac   •   Darling Ingredients Signs Commitment Letter to Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), Continues Advancing 2050 Net-Zero Goal   •   Hearts for Hospice and Catholic Hospice bring back The Best of the Best of Las Olas Luncheon   •   Family Research Council's Tony Perkins' Statement on the Final Passage of 'Respect for Marriage' Act   •   The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz Announces Investigation of Rite Aid Corporation (RAD) on Behalf of Investors   •   Alameda Health System's and Alameda County Public Health Department's BElovedBIRTH Black Centering Receives The 2022 Quality Lea   •   NEOGENOMICS SHAREHOLDER ALERT by Former Louisiana Attorney General: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Reminds Investors With Losses in   •   Walgreens Boots Alliance Sells Shares of AmerisourceBergen Corporation for $1.0 billion of Proceeds   •   JIM HENSON'S FAMILY HUB ON YOUTUBE LAUNCHES FULL EPISODES OF BELOVED PUPPET SERIES "PAJANIMALS" TO HELP PRESCHOOLERS WITH CHANGI   •   Connected California Program Launches to Bridge the Digital Divide   •   Hennessy Advisors, Inc. Announces Changes to the Board of Directors   •   TCU’s Tre’Vius Hodges-Tomlinson Named 2022 Paycom Jim Thorpe Award Winner   •   F45 ALERT: Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Announces that a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed Against F45 Training Holdings, I   •   Shareholder Notice: Robbins LLP Informs Investors of Class Action Against Iris Energy Limited (IREN)   •   The Urban League of Greater Atlanta Celebrates 100+ Years of Service to Metro Atlanta   •   PG&E Prepared to Respond to Significant Storm System Expected to Impact Northern and Central California this Weekend
Bookmark and Share

Lambda Legal: 9th Circuit Order Should Prompt Prop 8 Clarification


SAN FRANCISCO - A panel of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case Perry v. Schwarzenegger, certified to the California Supreme Court the question of whether California law either gives proponents of initiatives an interest in seeing that law enforced, or authorizes proponents to act in the place of the government to defend their initiative. Jennifer C. Pizer, National Marriage Project Director for Lambda Legal, issued the following statement:

"We hope the California Supreme Court takes up this procedural question about initiatives and believe the federal court's action was entirely reasonable.  State law is unclear on those important points, and that's problematic for our entire state. In California, so much lawmaking is done these days by popular vote at the ballot box. The public needs to know what processes exist for testing measures enacted by voters at the ballot box. The stakes are especially high for vulnerable minorities in this state, including the lesbian, gay and bisexual people targeted and made unequal by Proposition 8. The state high court's decision to allow the initiative power to be used in this unprecedented way - to strip a vulnerable minority of a fundamental constitutional right - essentially read all the equality guarantees out of the California Constitution, and left all of us vulnerable to the whims of an anxious or disgruntled populace.  

"We do not believe California law does or should allow initiative proponents special power to drive litigation about measures they have supported. Prop 8's proponents are not personally affected by that initiative as none of them wants to marry a same-sex partner. And state law up to this point has never authorized political activists to usurp the role of the state's chief executive and top lawyer if the activists disagree with those duly elected officials' decision not to prolong litigation of a particular court case.

"Whether the California Supreme Court decides to take up this question or not, the reality is that many thousands of lesbian, gay and bisexual Californians are being wrongfully denied their basic constitutional right to marry the person they love. If the trial judge's sound decision recognizing Prop 8's unconstitutionality cannot be appealed, it should be allowed to take effect promptly.  If it can be appealed, that process should proceed and his decision should be affirmed on its obvious constitutional merits.  

"And we all should keep in mind that, if California's high court does indeed take up the question about initiatives, what it says about state law will not necessarily determine the outcome of this case. Ultimately, federal procedural law controls what cases can be brought in federal court, by whom, and when.  That means the United States Supreme Court may yet review at least these procedural questions."

Lambda Legal is a national organization committed to achieving full recognition of the civil rights of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, transgender people and those with HIV through impact litigation, education and public policy work.



White House Live Stream
alsharpton Rev. Al Sharpton
9 to 11 am EST
jjackson Rev. Jesse Jackson
10 to noon CST


Sounds Make the News ®
Atlanta - WAOK-Urban
Berkley / San Francisco - KPFA-Progressive
Chicago - WVON-Urban
KJLH - Urban
Los Angeles - KJLH - Urban
WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
New York - WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
New York - WADO-Spanish
WBAI - Progressive
New York - WBAI - Progressive
Washington - WOL-Urban

Listen to United Natiosns News