Today's Date: December 7, 2022
Ventas Declares Fourth Quarter 2022 Dividend of $0.45 per Common Share   •   BCG and ABS Combine Expertise to Support Marine and Offshore Decarbonization   •   Edgewell Personal Care Named One of America's Most Responsible Companies in 2023   •   Minister Hussen participates in the first session of the United Nations Permanent Forum on People of African Descent   •   Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP, a Leading Securities Fraud Law Firm, Announces Investigation of Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) on Beha   •   Attention Shareholders:  Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Reminds Shareholders of Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsu   •   CER partners with Saskatchewan First Nations to develop energy information products   •   Government of Canada invests $1.2 million to promote mental health in postpartum women and their families within Asian and South   •   Congress Introduces Legislation to Place American Women's Suffrage Monument on the National Mall   •   GOOD Meat Partners with Huber’s, World’s First Butchery to Sell Cultivated Meat   •   President Barack Obama Reflects on Tragedy to Transformation at Sandy Hook Promise Benefit Ahead of 10-Year Remembrance   •   Sister Jean to Release Debut Memoir, Wake Up with Purpose!: What I've Learned in My First Hundred Years with Harper Select, on F   •   IPG Announces Grand Opening Event for New Homes Available For Sale at Mill Villa Estates, an Active Adult 55+ Community in James   •   EQUITY ALERT: Rosen Law Firm Encourages NeoGenomics, Inc. Investors with Losses to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in S   •   The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz Announces Investigation of Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) on Behalf of Investors   •   Univar Solutions Named on Newsweek's America's Most Responsible Companies 2023 List   •   Shareholder Alert: Robbins LLP Informs Investors of Class Action Against NeoGenomics, Inc. (NEO)   •   Anaergia Announces Operational and Commercial Milestones, Reaffirms Guidance for 2022, and Provides Guidance for 2023   •   SI CLASS ACTION NOTICE: Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP Files Securities Fraud Lawsuit Against Silvergate Capital Corporation   •   The National Kidney Foundation Honors Kidney Patient for Continuing to Advocate for Others
Bookmark and Share

Oversight Urged In Immigration Decisions

 WASHINGTON - In a continuing effort to promote greater federal court oversight of immigration decision-making, the American Immigration Council's Legal Action Center (LAC) recently submitted amicus (friend of the court) briefs in two cases involving motions to reopen. For noncitizens facing removal from the United States, a motion to reopen (an opportunity to present new evidence in a case) may be the last and only way to pursue their claims for lawful residency in the United States. Failure to grant such a motion might prevent anyone - from an asylum seeker to a U.S. citizen's family member - from presenting new evidence that could prevent deportation.  Yet, although the federal courts are the last chance for redress, they frequently refuse to hear claims that immigration courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals abuse their discretion when they deny motions to reopen.
 
The LAC argument is based on the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Kucana v. Holder that the Board of Immigration Appeals cannot shield its decisions from judicial review by labeling these decisions "discretionary." Only Congress can limit court review of motions to reopen, and it has not done so.
 
Given the gravity of removal from the United States, the high volume of immigration court cases, and the reality that most noncitizens do not have lawyers (only 39% of noncitizens were represented in immigration court in 2009), federal court oversight is critical to ensure due process.  For an immigration system that is widely understood to be plagued with errors, judicial checks and balances are especially critical.
 
The LAC's work on these cases builds on their successes in other oversight cases.  Last month, for example, the LAC convinced the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to withdraw a precedent-setting decision that would have prevented federal courts from hearing cases challenging government delays in adjudicating immigration applications.
 

 

The Legal Action Center strives to increase the accountability of government agencies that administer the immigration laws and to ensure these laws are interpreted and implemented in a way that honors fundamental constitutional and human rights. The LAC engages in impact litigation, appears as amicus curiae (friend of the court) before administrative tribunals and federal courts in significant immigration cases on targeted legal issues, and has long worked to protect the right to counsel for noncitizens facing removal from the United States.



STORY TAGS: GENERAL , BLACKS , AFRICAN AMERICAN , LATINO , HISPANIC , MINORITIES , CIVIL RIGHTS , DISCRIMINATION , RACISM , DIVERSITY , RACIAL EQUALITY , BIAS , EQUALITY

Video

White House Live Stream
LIVE VIDEO EVERY SATURDAY
alsharpton Rev. Al Sharpton
9 to 11 am EST
jjackson Rev. Jesse Jackson
10 to noon CST


Video

LIVE BROADCASTS
Sounds Make the News ®
WAOK-Urban
Atlanta - WAOK-Urban
KPFA-Progressive
Berkley / San Francisco - KPFA-Progressive
WVON-Urban
Chicago - WVON-Urban
KJLH - Urban
Los Angeles - KJLH - Urban
WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
New York - WKDM-Mandarin Chinese
WADO-Spanish
New York - WADO-Spanish
WBAI - Progressive
New York - WBAI - Progressive
WOL-Urban
Washington - WOL-Urban

Listen to United Natiosns News