LOS ANGELES - Three years ago this week, the U.S. Supreme Court released its 5-4 decision overturning
Louisville and Seattle’s voluntarily implemented integration plans and threatening many
voluntary plans across the country, the type of plans courts had encouraged for many years. The
Parents Involved decision, issued on June 28, 2007, reflected a divided Supreme Court with four
justices strongly supporting these voluntary plans and four justices strongly opposed. Justice
Kennedy’s opinion decided the issues and explicitly accepted some kinds of desegregation
efforts. The divided decision confused many educators and it was somewhat unclear what did
remain legal. In 2008, the Bush Administration sent a letter to school districts misguidedly
interpreting the Parents Involved decision in a way that suggested only race-neutral means of
pursuing integration would be legal. This was an inaccurate description of Kennedy’s controlling
opinion and suggested that school authorities should abandon all efforts to intentionally pursue
integration. As President Barack Obama took office, civil rights groups and other stakeholders
anticipated that his administration would be more supportive of integration efforts, including
issuing new guidance to replace that from 2008. Yet, well into the second year of the Obama
Administration (which announced earlier this year that it would reinvigorate the Office of Civil
Rights) no such guidance about voluntary integration has been issued. From our contacts with
school districts across the country, we believe that this guidance is much needed.
In addition to these legal and policy constraints—in addition to the opportunities and
challenges presented by rapidly shifting demographics in the nation’s public schools—districts,
like other governmental bodies, face significant financial pressure in the wake of declining
revenues stemming from the economic crisis. This economic pressure is forcing school districts
to make deep cuts in services, which is another potential constraint for integration efforts.
Ironically, at a time in which districts face these varied constraints and when some
districts may be grappling with diversity for the first time, we know more than ever about the
importance of preventing racially segregated schools and the benefits that students—and
society—receive from diverse schools. In fact, the Supreme Court, in its 2007 decision,
acknowledged this evidence as “compelling” reasons for districts to adopt policies to further
integration.
This report synthesizes major themes in local policymaking during the last year, as local
school districts continue to grapple with legal and economic constraints on policies that are
aimed at creating diverse schools. Our report last year on the second anniversary of Parents
Involved began to uncover some of the consequences of the difficult economic situation facing
many local and state governments in terms of budget cuts that affected integration efforts.1
There are also a number of ways the federal government is influencing districts’ policy efforts.
As part of the Civil Rights Project’s initiative on school integration, we have tracked
media accounts of school districts’ policies that may affect student diversity.2 While this is not
an exhaustive review, this memo summarizes developments in school districts across the country
over the last year. We found nearly 600 articles in 39 states.
We classify the developments into several categories below. First, we review the
changing demographics facing districts. Second, we examine the myriad of ways in which the
tightening economic climate affects districts’ integration efforts. Third, we describe the differing
ways in which the federal government is affecting districts’ efforts. Fourth, we look at the ways
in which communities have mobilized around integration over the last year. Finally, we
conclude by describing resources that could be helpful for educators and community members
who still seek to further diverse schools.